![]() ![]() low psychopathology and emotional constraint factors provided by American study of Haddy et al. Regarding the cross-cultural equivalence of the MCMI–III structure, Tucker's congruence coefficient (Φ) was used and confirmed that internalizing (F1) and externalizing psychopathology (F2) factors obtained in this study are similar to high vs. ![]() The eight EFA methods applied to the 24 clinical scales identified a consensual three-factor solution: factor I (internalizing psychopathology 18 scales), factor II (externalizing psychopathology 4 scales) and factor III (psychological disturbance 2 scales), accounting for a total of 72% of the common variance. Skewness, kurtosis, and descriptive statistics confirmed that scales of MCMI–III were normally distributed. Eight exploratory factor analysis (EFA) methods were used to explore the underlying structure of MCMI–III. Outpatients (N = 212) completed the MCMI–III during a semi-structured interview. ![]() However, little work has been done on the psychometric properties of the MCMI–III, using non-Western psychiatric samples. Factor analysis of the MCMI-III has produced mixed results, extracting parsimonious three-factor solutions, or replicating the original four-factor solution in psychiatric samples from Western countries. Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory MCMI–III is a multidimensional measure of psychopathology with excellent construct validity, test-retest reliability as well as internal consistency. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |